For the conflict that I chose
to share, I have changed names… just because you never know who might read this
blog.
Months ago, I scheduled a
workshop at a school in Florida. The
contract was signed, sealed, and delivered.
The only thing missing was the location and the amount of
participants. One month prior to the
training, I reached out to the supervisor only to find out that a location was
still being acquired, and the exact number of teachers would be determined
based on the location. It seemed like we
were going in a circle with no end, but I was determined to be patient. However, at two weeks prior to the workshop,
I was informed that nothing has changed; the circle was not opening.
At that point, my patience had
run its course. Without a participant
count, I could not prepare my supplies.
A count was critical; the location was not. After speaking with the supervisor (AKA
training director or consultant), I was informed that I need to remain patient,
because she was doing the best she could.
Then, she went on to suggest that I plan for 50, and if there were 100,
I could just add to the amount of supplies; at least, I was ahead of the
game. This was not a pretty circle
anymore, because I began to take it personally, which I understand was not a
great choice. However, I resented her
telling me what I need to do for my workshop, especially since so much of my
art workshop is hands-on. It is
imperative to have a count; there is a huge difference between 50 and 100.
To make a long story short, I
found out 3 days prior to the workshop that there would be approximately 80 in
attendance. My husband and I crammed
during this time to prepare, making certain we had enough materials for the
workshop.
This entire incident was, in
fact, a huge learning experience for me, and after taking this course, I
understand so much more. Without a
doubt, I needed to suggest a compromise.
I would prepare for a number of participants between 50 and 75, and that
would be the cap for the workshop.
Knowledge of Magda Gerber’s 3
R’s might have added a bit of sugar to this predicament. This individual and I have built a
relationship through a respectful, responsive, and reciprocal
relationship. I have presented numerous
times for this group. As an educator, I
pride myself on my workshops, and I understand the huge amount of time needed
to prepare. I was not going to do
anything but my best, and unfortunately 3 days prior was not respecting my
time; in addition, she was not, in my opinion, responsive to my needs as a
speaker.
As an early childhood
communicator, I learned that I need to be open and up-front. While suggesting a compromise might have
worked, I, also, could have been more specific.
I just presumed that the supervisor understood what went into presenting
a quality workshop. I was literally in
disbelief that nothing was falling into place, especially with my workshop
right around the corner. Looking back,
it would have helped tremendously if I explained the reason for needing a count
of participants; this might have encouraged understanding. Instead I became frustrated, adding to the
supervisor’s obvious frustration, and our personalities were adding to the
conflict. This explanation would have
built respect, encouraging a responsive answer; this would have gone a long way
to build upon our reciprocal relationship!
(I will add as a PS that I did
ask a fellow colleague of mine what she would have done in a similar situation…
she sparked up and said, “I would have cancelled!”)
That is a difficult situation to stay calm and patient in. You know how much goes into one of your workshops and clearly the director did not understand how her lack of information was impacting your preparations. Sometimes when dealing with a situation that is not being resolved, it is hard to keep a positive outlook. I am glad you were able to make it work, because like your colleague said others would have cancelled and let them figure it out.
ReplyDeleteHi Lois, that had to be a challenging and frustrating situation. I think your idea of setting a number that you were comfortable with and making a cap on the number of attendants is a smart idea. This way you have time to prepare, and that information could have made a difference in the venue selected for the conference. Both you and the organizer could have experiences a "win/win" situation.
ReplyDeleteHi Lois,
ReplyDeleteI agree with Jill, the idea of the cap seems like a "win/win" situation, it simplifies the dilemma for you both. It's like giving choices, but establishing the limits. I am glad though you aimed towards preserving your relationship and working with these folks, instead of proving a point by cancelling and expecting them to get it right the next time. Thanks for sharing.
Hi Lois,
ReplyDeleteIt was frustrating. Thank you for sharing your experience. As you said, you were trying your hardest to make the workshop be a successful and meaningful one. However, sometimes, we have to be patient with the team members to keep everyone on the same page. You have had many workshops, so you could still calm yourself down and be ready by the time of workshop. Thinking of a person who is going to have his/her first workshop, but cannot have the response or support from the organizer. It could be a disaster for the presenter. As you said, the mutual understanding and respect plays an important part in communicating, and compromise maybe not the best solution;however, it could be the most effective one.