Michael wore
the same clothes several days in a row; they were always clean. His shoes seemed a bit tight, but he did not
seem to mind. For lunch, he always
brought a bagel and cream cheese. We
gave Michael water to drink; we offered apple juice. He never had dessert. One day, I approached mom about the lunch
thing, asking why she sent the same thing every day. Michael’s mom said that’s what Michael
wanted; I accepted this.
One day,
however, Michael told me that he did not want bagels anymore. Again, I questioned Michael’s mom, but this
time, she asked if we could talk about this in my office (behind closed
doors). As you may have guessed by now,
Michael’s mom could not afford other food.
A local restaurant gave her day-old bagels and cream cheese for free. She became hysterical. When I heard that Michael went to bed hungry
sometime, I became hysterical.

To make a
long story short, the reality of the world was a part of my class. Hunger is everywhere. We worked with some amazing partnerships to
help Michael’s mom get food stamps, and with some help, she was able to secure
a part time secretarial job. She was
finished early enough to pick Michael up from school. This
is several years ago, and I heard, through the grapevine, that Michael’s mom
went back to school and is a nurse. WOW!
I chose to
look into the effects of hunger in Brazil.
Somewhere, I read about a program that assured food to everyone. In 1993, food was declared a right of
citizenship. In 2003, the administration
of Silva implemented the Zero Hunger program.
Silva wanted this right to be a part of the constitution. It was “added to the list of social rights
guaranteed under Article 6, together with education, healthy, work, and social
security; this made it irreversible” (Osava, 2009).
Local
farmers are offered choice public spaces to sell to the consumer; local produce
was also incorporated into school meals.
The city of Belo Horizonte (Brazil’s fourth largest city) put Direct
from the Country stands throughout busy areas.
“Money spent on processed, corporate food, now buys whole food mostly
from local growers” (Lappe, 2009). This
enabled many families the chance to expand their incomes or return to
agricultural production. The program
works with an electronic card.
Beneficiaries prove that the money they are receiving is being spent on
basic food items or cooking fuel. In
addition, families need to prove that their children are attending school. Adults enroll in training programs to improve
their employability and thus, reduce their future dependence.
Three rather
large “People’s Restaurants,” plus a few smaller venues has sprouted up in Belo. Together, they serve about 12,000 or more
people using primarily locally grown food.
Several novel solutions have arisen such as “egg shells, manioc leaves,
and other material normally thrown away were ground and minced into flour for
school kid’s daily bread” (Lappe, 2009).
For all of these efforts, the cost is a mere 10 million dollars
annually, which is about a penny a day per Belo resident and less than 2% of
the city’s budget.
This
experience demonstrates that the right to food does not necessarily mean free
handouts. It means “redefining the
“free” in “free market” as the freedom of all to participate.” Lappe (2009) states, “it’s easy to end hunger
if we are willing to see with new eyes – if we act no longer as mere voters or
protestors, for or against government, but as problem-solving partners with
government accountable to us.” This is
interesting indeed and has given me a lot to think about… I wonder if our
government has given this idea any thought… hmmm
Lappe, F.M.
(2009). The city that ended hunger. Yes
Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.yesmagazine.org/issues/food-for-everyone/the-city-that-ended-hunger
Osava,
Mario. (2009, October 16). Hunger beats a steady retreat. IPS
Inter Press Service. Retrieved from http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=44306